I purchased your book concerning five months agone, and that i hoped which may would "entitle" American state to some recommendation. First, let American state say that i am terribly glad with my purchase. Not solely will it provide recommendation on specific techniques, but, additional significantly, it explains the inspiration of all training--timing, motivation, consistency--allowing the dog owner to raised perceive the coaching method. Also, it will a really sensible job of explaining that dogs square measure pack animals--and can check the alpha's leadership at varied times (in my case, all the time)--and however that factors into coaching. Finally, i favor your sense approach, e.g., "stay" may be a double command, if the dog's not purported to break a sit or down while not the discharge command, why can we have to be compelled to tell it to remain.
My question isn't concerning dog coaching, however, however concerning breeds of dogs. Specifically, APBTs [American Pit Bull Terriers] and AmStaffs [American Staffordshire Terriers]. The AKC doesn't acknowledge the APBT as a breed, however, several dog fanciers acknowledge the 2 as separate breeds albeit they share a typical origin and appearance terribly similar. Or, if not separate breeds, 2 "strains" of constant breed, the AmStaff being bred for "show" and therefore the APBT being bred for "performance" - that means the lameness of the initial dogs has mostly been bred out of AmStaffs, however still remains in APBTs. i might prefer to hear your attack this subject since you own and have owned APBTs or mixes therefrom.
The reason I raise is that i am considering obtaining associate degree AmStaff or a employees Bull hunting dog. My spouse and that i presently own a Dalmatian, however, therefore i am alittle involved concerning the 2 obtaining on, particularly once i am not around. ought to I keep one's hands off from these breeds? I've had one stock breeder tell American state they ought to be fine if the employees is introduced as a puppy, whereas another told American state ne'er to go away them along alone. What would be your recommendation (I notice all dogs square measure people and will possess totally different traits than others of constant breed)?
Thanks,
Ryan Fehlig
Dear Ryan:
Thanks for the sort words. you've got asked a superb question!
I love the bull breeds, personally. And whereas everything you've got expressed is just about "right on the cash," ... i'd recommend that if you choose to adopt one amongst these breeds you create certain that:
1. The dog you are adopting is that the female of the dog you already own.
2. If the new dog may be a male, then neuter him before he hits sexual maturity. (Before one year getting on.)
3. If the opposite dog may be a male, then undoubtedly neuter him. (Although this may not be a "cure-all" it's going to facilitate somewhat.)
It's true... several of the dogs during this breed appear to own a genetic basis for dog aggression. i do not assume that they are available out of the female internal reproductive organ being dog aggressive, however rather that they need temperament characteristics that tend to create them additional dog aggressive. (i.e., dominance and a powerful defensive nature).
As for the distinction between the APBT and therefore the AmStaff, the distinction is essentially one amongst registration. (AKC vs. UKC). And yes, the AKC version has been bred with additional of a stress on conformation (like all AKC breeds).
If I were to adopt another bull breed, it'd doubtless be the Staffordshire Bull hunting dog (the smallest of the "pit bull" breeds). i favor the thought of getting a giant dog in an exceedingly little package. however to be honest, i am very uninterested in the media stigma that this breed has received. And in reality terms, this suggests having a dog that you just will ne'er very kick off leash at a park - not as a result of the dog is dangerous or untrained - however rather as a result of folks square measure therefore darn fearful of what the media has diode them to believe concerning this breed, that they snatch their kids and run screaming from the park.
On the upper side, this stigma will add your favor, too. Most criminals apprehend that a "pit bull" is that the sort of dog that you just don't need living within the house that you are on the brink of rob.
On a private note, there was a personality World Health Organization let his Rottweiler escape leash at the park I accustomed train at. This dog had a foul angle and was a really dominant-aggressive dog. The owner was underneath the impression that his dog was trained. He'd provide multiple commands, such as, 'Ranger come back, come, come, come,'... however all Ranger would do is have interaction my clients' dogs and take a look at to initiate a dog fight.
Well, when I adopted Forbes (an APBT-mix that appears like one huge muscle and is concerning as wide as a macintosh truck) and commenced keeping him in an exceedingly down-stay whereas I worked with my clients' dogs... Ranger's owner suddenly started keeping their dog on a far shorter leash. If he did not attach his dog to a leash as before long as he saw American state enter the park, then he'd undoubtedly run to grab his dog THE terribly INSTANT that he saw that Ranger wasn't about to right away flip and are available once known as.
I guess that is what you decision motivation, eh?
Yes... it's most likely a masculine issue. however IF there's a stigma, then you may likewise use it to your advantage to encourage reckless dog homeowners with untrained dogs to stay their mutts on-leash.
That's all for currently, folks!
My question isn't concerning dog coaching, however, however concerning breeds of dogs. Specifically, APBTs [American Pit Bull Terriers] and AmStaffs [American Staffordshire Terriers]. The AKC doesn't acknowledge the APBT as a breed, however, several dog fanciers acknowledge the 2 as separate breeds albeit they share a typical origin and appearance terribly similar. Or, if not separate breeds, 2 "strains" of constant breed, the AmStaff being bred for "show" and therefore the APBT being bred for "performance" - that means the lameness of the initial dogs has mostly been bred out of AmStaffs, however still remains in APBTs. i might prefer to hear your attack this subject since you own and have owned APBTs or mixes therefrom.
The reason I raise is that i am considering obtaining associate degree AmStaff or a employees Bull hunting dog. My spouse and that i presently own a Dalmatian, however, therefore i am alittle involved concerning the 2 obtaining on, particularly once i am not around. ought to I keep one's hands off from these breeds? I've had one stock breeder tell American state they ought to be fine if the employees is introduced as a puppy, whereas another told American state ne'er to go away them along alone. What would be your recommendation (I notice all dogs square measure people and will possess totally different traits than others of constant breed)?
Thanks,
Ryan Fehlig
Dear Ryan:
Thanks for the sort words. you've got asked a superb question!
I love the bull breeds, personally. And whereas everything you've got expressed is just about "right on the cash," ... i'd recommend that if you choose to adopt one amongst these breeds you create certain that:
1. The dog you are adopting is that the female of the dog you already own.
2. If the new dog may be a male, then neuter him before he hits sexual maturity. (Before one year getting on.)
3. If the opposite dog may be a male, then undoubtedly neuter him. (Although this may not be a "cure-all" it's going to facilitate somewhat.)
It's true... several of the dogs during this breed appear to own a genetic basis for dog aggression. i do not assume that they are available out of the female internal reproductive organ being dog aggressive, however rather that they need temperament characteristics that tend to create them additional dog aggressive. (i.e., dominance and a powerful defensive nature).
As for the distinction between the APBT and therefore the AmStaff, the distinction is essentially one amongst registration. (AKC vs. UKC). And yes, the AKC version has been bred with additional of a stress on conformation (like all AKC breeds).
If I were to adopt another bull breed, it'd doubtless be the Staffordshire Bull hunting dog (the smallest of the "pit bull" breeds). i favor the thought of getting a giant dog in an exceedingly little package. however to be honest, i am very uninterested in the media stigma that this breed has received. And in reality terms, this suggests having a dog that you just will ne'er very kick off leash at a park - not as a result of the dog is dangerous or untrained - however rather as a result of folks square measure therefore darn fearful of what the media has diode them to believe concerning this breed, that they snatch their kids and run screaming from the park.
On the upper side, this stigma will add your favor, too. Most criminals apprehend that a "pit bull" is that the sort of dog that you just don't need living within the house that you are on the brink of rob.
On a private note, there was a personality World Health Organization let his Rottweiler escape leash at the park I accustomed train at. This dog had a foul angle and was a really dominant-aggressive dog. The owner was underneath the impression that his dog was trained. He'd provide multiple commands, such as, 'Ranger come back, come, come, come,'... however all Ranger would do is have interaction my clients' dogs and take a look at to initiate a dog fight.
Well, when I adopted Forbes (an APBT-mix that appears like one huge muscle and is concerning as wide as a macintosh truck) and commenced keeping him in an exceedingly down-stay whereas I worked with my clients' dogs... Ranger's owner suddenly started keeping their dog on a far shorter leash. If he did not attach his dog to a leash as before long as he saw American state enter the park, then he'd undoubtedly run to grab his dog THE terribly INSTANT that he saw that Ranger wasn't about to right away flip and are available once known as.
I guess that is what you decision motivation, eh?
Yes... it's most likely a masculine issue. however IF there's a stigma, then you may likewise use it to your advantage to encourage reckless dog homeowners with untrained dogs to stay their mutts on-leash.
That's all for currently, folks!
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire